Valentino

Spring 2026 Couture Fashion Show Review

One Look at a Time

Review of Valentino Spring 2026 Couture Fashion Show

By Mackenzie Richard Zuckerman


Alessandro Michele’s sophomore couture outing for Valentino was always going to be a moment. But its biggest surprise may have been what it didn’t do.

For a designer known for maximalist storytelling and rich references, this collection was unexpectedly quiet – more sacred than sensational. It wisely moved away from being an assertion of authorship and towards a reverent continuation of the house itself. This felt more Valentino than Michele. More about the atelier than the auteur.

To some, that may have read as a lack of identity – or a lack of coherence. But coherence wasn’t the point. Not in the traditional, visual sense. This was a show about perception. A meditation on what it means to see in an age of saturation, speed, and surface scrolling. The collection didn’t demand to be consumed – it respectfully asked to be considered.


Michele described the show as a “restoration of wonder” – a cinematic experience inspired by the Kaiserpanorama, a 19th-century carousel-like device that offered each viewer a slightly different vantage point. Watching together, but never quite the same. It’s a quietly radical metaphor for couture – and for this show in particular. That concept was brought to life through the staging: audience members were seated before oversized viewing frames, watching each look emerge one by one. It transformed the act of watching into a ritual and allowed the emotional pacing of the collection to unfold slowly and deliberately.

So – can a collection linger longer by refusing to reveal itself all at once?

THE COLLECTION

THE WOW FACTOR
9
THE ENGAGEMENT FACTOR
10
THE STYLING
9
THE CRAFTSMANSHIP
9
THE RETAIL READINESS
9
PROS
Emotional Cohesion Despite Visual Variety: Despite an intentionally fragmented presentation, the collection achieved an underlying emotional coherence that made it feel whole – proof that unity doesn’t require uniformity.
Reverent Restraint from a Maximalist Hand: Alessandro Michele’s willingness to pull back, letting fabric and form carry the message, revealed a more introspective dimension to his work.
A Radical Slowing Down: In an era of oversaturation, the show demanded intentional looking and offered deep rewards for those who lingered – garments that invited emotion over immediacy.
Immersive and Conceptually Aligned Set Design: The show’s staging – where audience members viewed the collection through oversized “viewing frames,” one look at a time – brilliantly echoed Michele’s Kaiserpanorama inspiration. It wasn’t just aesthetic; it physically slowed down the act of looking, making the concept tangible and heightening the intimacy of the viewing experience.
Cons
Apparent Lack of Visual Coherence at First Glance: For some, the absence of a clear throughline in theme/narrative may have initially read as confusion rather than intention.
Not Designed for Instant Impact: The subtlety and ambiguity of the presentation required time and reflection to appreciate – qualities that may be missed in today’s fast-paced media landscape.

THE VIBE

Reverent Composition & Fragmented Harmony

The Showstopper


If the collection felt inconsistent, that was by design. Michele wasn’t working toward cohesion in the conventional sense – he was building a carousel of couture, where garments emerged like vignettes from a dream, each with its own rhythm and internal logic. What unified them wasn’t silhouette or palette, but an emotional register: reverence, introspection, and the allure of looking slowly.

That spirit animated the experience. Some looks championed fabric itself – gathered skirts, sculptural puffed sleeves, and rich cloth left deliberately bare, confident that the material alone could carry the moment. Others leaned into ornamentation, drenching the body in beadwork and ecclesiastical flourishes. Both gestures – restraint and excess – were executed with sincerity. Even the most elaborate looks felt slowed down, resisting immediacy. Michele invited us not to scan, but to stay. This was couture designed to hold your gaze – and to reward that stillness.

Let’s clarify – the collection wasn’t a thesis – it was a peep show, in the most poetic sense: an invitation to linger, to contemplate, to look again. Within that framework, Michele offered moments of sincere beauty: glimmers of Old Hollywood, flickers of ecclesiastic romanticism, silhouettes that floated between fantasy and function. He resisted the urge to dominate. Instead, he made space for ambiguity – for viewers to draw their own conclusions. Not every look was meant to dazzle; some were meant to haunt, to sit unresolved in the mind. That’s a harder trick to pull off – and arguably a more lasting one.

THE DIRECTION

THE ON-BRAND FACTOR
9
THE BRAND EVOLUTION
9
THE PRESENTATION
10
THE INVITATION
9

THE QUOTE

I wanted to oblige people to see again – to stop, to feel, to care. Couture lets us dream with our hands. It’s not about speed or spectacle; it’s about looking closely, like watching a film in the dark. That shimmer, that intimacy – that’s where fashion becomes magic.

— Alessandro Michele

THE WRAP UP

Michele’s couture this season reframed the idea of attention – circling it, refracting it, complicating it. For a designer so often associated with extravagance, the restraint here felt revelatory. Yes, there were gestures of grandeur. But the real power lay in how often he pulled back – how often he let fabric, form, or mood do the speaking.

The show wasn’t meant to cohere in the traditional sense – and that’s precisely where its meaning lived. Michele offered a different framework for couture this season: one built on slowness, subjectivity, and emotional proximity. The absence of a singular – perhaps more immediately obvious – message wasn’t a shortcoming. It was a provocation. In a landscape that too often conflates clarity with value, Michele asked us to sit with opacity – and to treat beauty as something worth decoding.

For Valentino, this may mark a period of quiet redefinition. If the house continues down this path, the conversation around it may shift – not just about what it looks like, but about what it feels like. That’s a different kind of power. And one that doesn’t fade as quickly from view.


Editorial Director | The Impression